aic7xxx support for >2TB volumes?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all, 

After some searching through newgroups and mailing lists, I haven't really 
found an answer to the question: is the aic7xxx driver capable of supporting 
larger than 2 terabytes volumes? I have read some success reports, but some 
failed attempts too...

I actually have an external RAID array, hosting a 6TB virtual disk, plugged on 
an Adaptec 39160 SCSI card. I'm using a 2.6.14 kernel, with  CONFIG_LBD=y, 
and thus, the aic7xxx (ver 7.0) module.

My dmesg show the following:

scsi1 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 7.0
        <Adaptec 3960D Ultra160 SCSI adapter>
        aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
  Vendor: transtec  Model: T6100S16R1-D      Rev: 342J
  Type:   Direct-Access                      ANSI SCSI revision: 05
scsi1:A:0:0: Tagged Queuing enabled.  Depth 32
 target1:0:0: Beginning Domain Validation
 target1:0:0: wide asynchronous.
 target1:0:0: FAST-80 WIDE SCSI 160.0 MB/s DT (12.5 ns, offset 127)
 target1:0:0: Ending Domain Validation
sdb : very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16).
sdb : READ CAPACITY(16) failed.
sdb : status=0, message=00, host=5, driver=00
sdb : use 0xffffffff as device size
SCSI device sdb: 4294967296 512-byte hdwr sectors (2199023 MB)
SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back
sdb : very big device. try to use READ CAPACITY(16).
sdb : READ CAPACITY(16) failed.
sdb : status=0, message=00, host=5, driver=00
sdb : use 0xffffffff as device size
SCSI device sdb: 4294967296 512-byte hdwr sectors (2199023 MB)
SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back
 sdb: unknown partition table
Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
Attached scsi generic sg2 at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 0

Whatever the real size of the volume, it always give a "4294967296 512-byte 
hdwr sectors (2199023 MB)" device...

Is there a way to support a >2TB volume on this SCSI controler? I know I could 
split my volume in smaller ones and use LVM to reassemble them, but I'd like 
to avoid adding overhead to the storage stack, and keep it the simplest.

Thanks in advance for any hint/advice,
Best regards,

-- 
Kilian CAVALOTTI                      Administrateur réseaux et systèmes
UPMC / CNRS - LIP6 (C870)
8, rue du Capitaine Scott                          Tel. : 01 44 27 88 54
75015 Paris - France                               Fax. : 01 44 27 70 00
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux