On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:47:18PM -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > Sure, sounds reasonable -- perhaps we can get some consensus from the > list and come up with the date (arbitrary as it may be), at least it > would motivate those affected (QLogic)... sure. Does June 2006 sounds reasonable? > > > +config SCSI_QLA21XX > > > + tristate " Build QLogic ISP2100 firmware-module" > > > + depends on SCSI_QLA2XXX_EMBEDDED_FIRMWARE > > > ---help--- > > > This driver supports the QLogic 21xx (ISP2100) host adapter family. > > > > don't the help-text need some update? > > I'm inclined to drop the help-text entirely for the firmware-module > entries, as I'm not sure one needs more info than the menu-item: > > [ ] Build QLogic ISP2100 firmware-module > > already states. What were you looking for? Dropping the help text makes sense. > > I'd say just use this else clause unconditionally. no need to optimize for > > the 1% users using the deprecated builtin-firmware and compile just for > > a subsystet of the supported cards. > > As this patchset looks to be more 2.6.16 material, I'll redo the > patches with this change along with any additional feedback and a few > minor bits. > > James, would you like me to resubmit now for staging in scsi-misc-2.6 > for 2.6.16? Given that it's needed to support the ISP24xx i'd love to see it in 2.6.15 - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
