Re: [PATCH 2/10] seperate max sectors and max hw sectors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 18:57 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
> > Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >On Tue, Nov 08 2005, Mike Christie wrote:
> > >
> > >>Seperate max_hw_sectors and max_sectors.
> > >>
> > >>LLDs call blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() to set max_hw_sectors.
> > >>blk_queue_max_sectors will also set max_sectors to a safe
> > >>default value.
> > >>
> > >>blk_init_queue still calls blk_queue_max_sectors so if there
> > >>are any LLDs that do not call blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() and
> > >>were expecting both the max_sectors and max_hw_sectors to be
> > >>255 they do not have to do anything.
> > >>
> > >>I was not able to test every driver I touched, but I think the
> > >>only place I may have messed up is MD so some testing is needed.
> > >
> > >
> > >->max_sectors will become less of a driver property and more of a
> > >block/vm propery, so I think the best way to do this is just to have
> > >blk_queue_max_sectors() set ->max_hw_sectors directly and lower
> > >->max_sectors appropriately if it is lower. That also comes with the
> > >bonus of not having to modify drivers.
> > >
> > 
> > Ugggh. I did this in reverse to make the naming nicer. So I added a 
> > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors() which sets ->max_sectors to some Block layer 
> > default and ->max_hw_sectors to the hw limit (for SCSI this is the scsi 
> > host template ->max_sectors). Is this ok? It is more clear for driver 
> > writers that they are setting max_hw_sectors when calling 
> > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(). I also converted all the 
> > blk_queue_max_sectors() to blk_queue_max_hw_sectors().
> 
> Driver writers need not know. They call blk_queue_max_sectors() to set
> the maximum value of a request they can handle, they could not care less
> what internal field in the queue is actually used for that. From their
> perspective, blk_queue_max_sectors() defines their hard limit. We may
> (and will) adjust the soft limit behind their back - which is ok, as
> long as we honor the value they defined by calling
> blk_queue_max_sectors().
> 

all right, is this patch ok?  I changed MAX_SECTORS to SAFE_MAX_SECTORS
incase someone was relying on it being 255, and it adds the block layer
default to be BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS (1024). It also makes block layer
SG_IO use max_hw_sectors instead of max_sectors. But what is
sg_set_reserved_size used for?

This was made against the first patch in the patchset, but can apply
with offsets without it.


diff --git a/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
index f9b83d2..b1c4604 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ void blk_queue_make_request(request_queu
 	q->backing_dev_info.ra_pages = (VM_MAX_READAHEAD * 1024) / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
 	q->backing_dev_info.state = 0;
 	q->backing_dev_info.capabilities = BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY;
-	blk_queue_max_sectors(q, MAX_SECTORS);
+	blk_queue_max_sectors(q, SAFE_MAX_SECTORS);
 	blk_queue_hardsect_size(q, 512);
 	blk_queue_dma_alignment(q, 511);
 	blk_queue_congestion_threshold(q);
@@ -557,7 +557,12 @@ void blk_queue_max_sectors(request_queue
 		printk("%s: set to minimum %d\n", __FUNCTION__, max_sectors);
 	}
 
-	q->max_sectors = q->max_hw_sectors = max_sectors;
+	if (BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS > max_hw_sectors)
+		q->max_hw_sectors = q->max_sectors = max_hw_sectors;
+ 	else {
+		q->max_sectors = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
+		q->max_hw_sectors = max_hw_sectors;
+	}
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_sectors);
@@ -659,8 +664,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_hardsect_size);
 void blk_queue_stack_limits(request_queue_t *t, request_queue_t *b)
 {
 	/* zero is "infinity" */
-	t->max_sectors = t->max_hw_sectors =
-		min_not_zero(t->max_sectors,b->max_sectors);
+	t->max_sectors = min_not_zero(t->max_sectors,b->max_sectors);
+	t->max_hw_sectors = min_not_zero(t->max_hw_sectors,b->max_hw_sectors);
 
 	t->max_phys_segments = min(t->max_phys_segments,b->max_phys_segments);
 	t->max_hw_segments = min(t->max_hw_segments,b->max_hw_segments);
@@ -2147,7 +2152,7 @@ int blk_rq_map_user(request_queue_t *q, 
 	struct bio *bio;
 	int reading;
 
-	if (len > (q->max_sectors << 9))
+	if (len > (q->max_hw_sectors << 9))
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (!len || !ubuf)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -2262,7 +2267,7 @@ int blk_rq_map_kern(request_queue_t *q, 
 {
 	struct bio *bio;
 
-	if (len > (q->max_sectors << 9))
+	if (len > (q->max_hw_sectors << 9))
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (!len || !kbuf)
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c
index 382dea7..4e390df 100644
--- a/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/block/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static int sg_io(struct file *file, requ
 	if (verify_command(file, cmd))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-	if (hdr->dxfer_len > (q->max_sectors << 9))
+	if (hdr->dxfer_len > (q->max_hw_sectors << 9))
 		return -EIO;
 
 	if (hdr->dxfer_len)
diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
index 460554b..d7ed8af 100644
--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@ -313,7 +313,8 @@ int bio_get_nr_vecs(struct block_device 
 }
 
 static int __bio_add_page(request_queue_t *q, struct bio *bio, struct page
-			  *page, unsigned int len, unsigned int offset)
+			  *page, unsigned int len, unsigned int offset,
+			  unsigned short max_sectors)
 {
 	int retried_segments = 0;
 	struct bio_vec *bvec;
@@ -327,7 +328,7 @@ static int __bio_add_page(request_queue_
 	if (bio->bi_vcnt >= bio->bi_max_vecs)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (((bio->bi_size + len) >> 9) > q->max_sectors)
+	if (((bio->bi_size + len) >> 9) > max_sectors)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -401,8 +402,8 @@ static int __bio_add_page(request_queue_
 int bio_add_page(struct bio *bio, struct page *page, unsigned int len,
 		 unsigned int offset)
 {
-	return __bio_add_page(bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev), bio, page,
-			      len, offset);
+	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev);
+	return __bio_add_page(q, bio, page, len, offset, q->max_sectors);
 }
 
 struct bio_map_data {
@@ -514,7 +515,8 @@ struct bio *bio_copy_user(request_queue_
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if (__bio_add_page(q, bio, page, bytes, 0) < bytes) {
+		if (__bio_add_page(q, bio, page, bytes, 0, q->max_hw_sectors) <
+				   bytes) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			break;
 		}
@@ -628,7 +630,8 @@ static struct bio *__bio_map_user_iov(re
 			/*
 			 * sorry...
 			 */
-			if (__bio_add_page(q, bio, pages[j], bytes, offset) < bytes)
+			if (__bio_add_page(q, bio, pages[j], bytes, offset,
+					   q->max_hw_sectors) < bytes)
 				break;
 
 			len -= bytes;
@@ -802,7 +805,7 @@ static struct bio *__bio_map_kern(reques
 			bytes = len;
 
 		if (__bio_add_page(q, bio, virt_to_page(data), bytes,
-				   offset) < bytes)
+				   offset, q->max_hw_sectors) < bytes)
 			break;
 
 		data += bytes;
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 46e927b..37ac77b 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ extern int blkdev_issue_flush(struct blo
 
 #define MAX_PHYS_SEGMENTS 128
 #define MAX_HW_SEGMENTS 128
-#define MAX_SECTORS 255
+#define SAFE_MAX_SECTORS 255
+#define BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS 1024
 
 #define MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE	65536
 







-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux