> On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:59 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > That is, is usb-storage forcing scsi-2 when the device > tells us it is > > > scsi-3 compliant, or is the hardware reporting devices > are scsi-2, yet > > > requiring non-LUN value in cdb[1]? > > > > I think we may have both. However I don't know how this > Cypress chip > > reports itself. A system log showing the INQUIRY data would be very > > helpful. > > We were told in prior emails that it actually reports a level of zero > (i.e. no compliance with any SCSI standard). My original proposal was > just not to modify the CDB[1] for this case if we could get > the INQUIRY > passed through unmangled. Here is the inquiry data on my CY7C68300B: 00-03: 00 00 00 00 04-07: 1F 00 00 00 08-11: 57 44 43 20 12-15: 57 44 34 30 16-19: 30 55 45 2D 20-23: 30 30 48 43 24-27: 54 30 20 20 28-31: 20 20 20 20 32-35: 30 30 30 30 36-39: 00 00 00 00 40-43: 00 00 00 00 Regards, Tim Thelin - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
