> On Sunday, November 06, 2005 11:03 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > @@ -2598,24 +2544,6 @@ mptscsih_event_process(MPT_ADAPTER *ioc, > break; > > case MPI_EVENT_INTEGRATED_RAID: /* 0B */ > - { > - pMpiEventDataRaid_t pRaidEventData = > - (pMpiEventDataRaid_t) pEvReply->Data; > -#ifdef MPTSCSIH_ENABLE_DOMAIN_VALIDATION > - /* Domain Validation Needed */ > - if (ioc->bus_type == SCSI && > - pRaidEventData->ReasonCode == > - MPI_EVENT_RAID_RC_DOMAIN_VAL_NEEDED) > - mptscsih_set_dvflags_raid(hd, > pRaidEventData->PhysDiskNum); > -#endif > - break; > - } > - I forgot to mention in previous email, we can't just delete the handling of MPI_EVENT_RAID_RC_DOMAIN_VAL_NEEDED asyn event. Someone that has a degraded fault tolerant array, such as RAID1 or RAID1E, will have poor performance(asyn narrow) once they replace the failed drive with an optimal drive. This event is needed so when the new drive is added, we can perform domain validation on the hidden disk. Thus James, can you handle notifying the spi transport layer of this new disk? Eric Moore - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html