Re: [PATCH resend] Allow both megaraid drivers to be built

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 14:24 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Here's a rediff of a patch I sent at the end of August.
> 
> Rename megaraid to megaraid_legacy, changing sysfs name, module
> name, and the messages printed out via printk. I have left the procfs name as
> "megaraid" as presumably userspace tools rely on this.
> 
> Remove hardware ID's from megaraid_legacy which overlap with the newgen
> megaraid drivers.
> 
> Allow megaraid_legacy to be built alongside the newgen driver.
> 
> Instead of renaming the file locally and sending a huge unreviewable diff, 
> I've left the original filenames (megaraid.c and megaraid.h) in place. Please 
> use git-mv to rename these to megaraid_legacy.[ch] once you have applied this.

This looks fine to me.  I would, however, like input from the megaraid
maintainers, since it actually involves a name change.  However, if
there are no comments before we got -rc, I'll queue it for after 2.6.15

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux