Re: [PATCH RFC] yet more struct scsi_lun

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Christie wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:


On the SCSI side, I would suggest just making shost->max_sectors set
q->max_hw_sectors and leave q->max_sectors to some generic kernel-wide
block layer define (of course making sure that ->max_sectors <=


If the value for this block layer define was around 16,000 sectors, would that be ok? The reason I ask is becuase when I get .....


->max_hw_sectors). That's the easy part.

The bio_add_page() stuff is a little trickier, since it wants to know if
this is fs or 'generic' io. For fs io, we would like to cap the building
of the bio to ->max_sectors, but for eg SG_IO issued io it should go as
high as ->max_hw_sectors. Perhaps the easiest is just to have
bio_fs_add_page() and bio_pc_add_page(), each just passing in the max
value as an integer to bio_add_page(). But it's not exactly pretty.

The ll_rw_blk.c merging is easy, since you don't need to do anything
there. It should test against ->max_sectors as it already does, since
this (sadly) is still the primary way we build large ios.


.... here, I am running into a problem. Basically, as you know the largest BIO we can make is 1 MB due to BIO_MAX_PAGES, and for st and sg we need to support commands around 6 MB, so we would have a request with 6 BIOs. To make this monster request I wanted to use the block layer functions and do something like this:

+       for (i = 0; i < nsegs; i++) {
+ bio = bio_map_pages(q, sg[i].page, sg[i].length, sg[i].offset, gfp);

oh yeah bio_map_pages, just takes an array of pages and does bio_*_add_page on them.

+               if (IS_ERR(bio)) {
+                       err = PTR_ERR(bio);
+                       goto free_bios;
+               }
+               len += sg[i].length;
+
+               bio->bi_flags &= ~(1 << BIO_SEG_VALID);
+               if (rq_data_dir(rq) == WRITE)
+                       bio->bi_rw |= (1 << BIO_RW);
+               blk_queue_bounce(q, &bio);
+
+               if (i == 0)
+                       blk_rq_bio_prep(q, rq, bio);

/* hope to carve out the __make_request code that does the below operations and make a fucntion that can be shared */

+               else if (!q->back_merge_fn(q, rq, bio)) {
+                       err = -EINVAL;
+                       bio_endio(bio, bio->bi_size, 0);
+                       goto free_bios;
+               } else {
+                       rq->biotail->bi_next = bio;
+                       rq->biotail = bio;
+                       rq->hard_nr_sectors += bio_sectors(bio);
+                       rq->nr_sectors = rq->hard_nr_sectors;

........

But since q->back_merge_fn() tests against q->max_sectors, it must be a high value so that we can merge in those BIOs. I mean if q->max_sectors is some reasonable number like only 1024 sectors, q->back_merge_fn will return a failure. Should I instead seperate ll_back_merge_fn into two functions, one that checks the sectors and one that checks the segments or if ll_back_merge_fn tested for max_hw_sectors we would be ok too?


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux