Re: [PATCH 1/2] tidy up scsi_error_handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 01:01:55AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>  	/*
> -	 * Note - we always use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE even if the module
> -	 * was loaded as part of the kernel.  The reason is that
> -	 * UNINTERRUPTIBLE would cause this thread to be counted in
> -	 * the load average as a running process, and an interruptible
> -	 * wait doesn't.
> +	 * We use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE so that the thread is not
> +	 * counted against the load average as a running process.
> +	 * We never actually get interrupted because kthread_run
> +	 * disables singal delivery for the created thread.

tpyo "signal".

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux