On 10/21/05 14:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>How about this: Why not as a char device?
>
> you can implement a char device using the block layer. See
> drivers/scsi/{ch.c,osst.c,sg.c,st.c} for examples.
Christoph, you failed to see that my question was _rhetorical_.
> That beeing said I tried this approach. It looks pretty cool when you
> think about it, but the block layer is quite a bit too heavyweight for
> queueing up a few SMP requests, and we need to carry too much useless
> code around for it.
That's the last reason not to implement SMP as a block device.
But this is good that you tried it and it "flopped". This way
people will stop repeating "SMP... block device".
Luben
--
http://linux.adaptec.com/sas/
http://www.adaptec.com/sas/
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
