On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:37:07AM -0700, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > > Here's the updated license we'd like to propose. Please note the > > verbiage regarding the questionable relicensing of the driver codes > > has been removed. > > please don't hard-code qlogic in the license, you're not the only > copytight holder and adding everyone gets to long. The only license > I'd be willing to dual-license my code under is the extremly simple > mit-style license used by the openbsd project: > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > I'll also send you a list of the files that have singnificant contributions > from me so you can add me to the copyright lines.I though that wasn't > nessecary, but who knows what odd ideas legal departments will come up > with next. Sorry, but QLogic is not requesting that the driver codes be dual-licensed. The license explcitely states the codes are under the GPL and the firmware blobs are under the BSD style license. Where's the disconnect? -- Andrew Vasquez - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
