Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 02:38:24AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > >>FYI and reviewing pleassure. > > > NACK, no more new procfs support for scsi driver. James Bottomley, Is there any such policy? Christoph Hellwig previously has used this purported policy to reject scsi procfs bug fixes: "[PATCH] scsi: /proc/scsi/scsi patch for large number of devices" As for alternate tools to 'cat /proc/scsi/scsi', I am not aware of many distributions using lsscsi (debian and gentoo do), perhaps there are other tools. I suspect a lot of folks are still using 'cat /proc/scsi/scsi'. Does Christoph Hellwig have the right to NACK/veto etc work that is not his when you are the SCSI maintainer? Douglas Gilbert - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
