Re: Adaptec SAS integration notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Luben Tuikov wrote:
--- Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(HCIL should get marginalized, as all agree)

"Marginalized" was not the term that I remember.

* Put HCIL mapping into top-level helper code, for sharing between FC
and SAS (hopefully!)

One step further: eliminate the ugly legacy SPI-centric HCIL from
SCSI Core.  Minimise and streamline SCSI Core.

I agree. FC, SAS, USB, SBP et al do not need to _share_ some HCIL mapping helpers --- they and the core need to get rid of HCIL mapping entirely. Why spend energy on optimization of existing HCIL mappings?

usb-storage and sbp2 already implement the leanest possible HCIL mapping (1 logical unit to 1 H). There is only one way to make this even more leaner and, at the same time, cleaner.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=-= =-=- -====
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux