Re: Followup on patches as571 and as572

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:09 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> I haven't heard anything back about these two patches:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112801815229091&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112801965207763&w=2
> 
> They were submitted a couple of weeks ago, and they don't appear in your 
> scsi-misc git repository.

I was waiting for Jens to comment since he's supposed to be the sr
maintainer.

To me, the first looks fine.  The second alters the behaviour of error
completion.  Previously we report the number of good bytes up to the
first bad block in linux filesystem terms.  Now we report it up to the
first bad block in hardsect terms.  I'm not sure if anything actually
cares, but I don't really see a reason to change it.

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux