Luben Tuikov wrote:
* libata-scsi would need a _lot_ of changes to become SATL. Would it be more efficient to start from a clean slate (drivers/scsi/satl/satl.c) or change libata-scsi beyond recognition? What is the political stance on this?
We don't need multiple ATA<->SCSI simulators in the kernel. Jeff - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
