Re: Removing BROKEN scsi drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:27:09AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Kars de Jong wrote:
> > On wo, 2005-10-05 at 13:32 +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:39:25PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 05:31:08AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:14:32PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > > SCSI_AMIGA7XX - no maintainer, broken forever
> > > > > > MVME16x_SCSI - no maintainer, broken forever
> > > > > > BVME6000_SCSI - same
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't think there's any point in deleting these.  I'm not even sure
> > > > > why they're marked BROKEN.  They share 99% of their code with drivers
> > > > > which are working.  And I thought Richard Hirst was maintaining them ...
> > > > 
> > > > They don't.  All these use the broken and obsolete 53c7xx driver, not
> > > > James new 53c700 core.  The driver should be easy to reimplement based
> > > > on the 53x700 for someone who has the hardware and cares about it.
> > > 
> > > I never claimed to maintain the amiga stuff, but you are right that they
> > > all use the 53c7xx driver that I originally created.  The sensible thing
> > > to do is to migrate those systems to use James 53c700 core, but it seems
> > > wise to poll the linux-m68k list before removing them.  I don't do much
> > > with my VME hardware these days but I know there have been patches
> > > posted for the serial driver recently so maybe someone has the scsi
> > > working.
> > 
> > I have at least the 53c7xx driver and the MVME16X driver working, the
> > Amiga and BVME stuff is untested (but does compile).
> > 
> > I patched the 53c7xx core to get it to work again, but the patch is ugly
> > and uses some mid level SCSI driver internals, which it shouldn't. It's
> > currently only present in the m68k CVS repository.
> 
> Indeed:
> 
> http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-2.6.x-merging/POSTPONED/520-53c7xx.diff
> 
> It was rejected upstream because patches for the 53c7xx driver are no longer
> accepted. we should use the 53c700 core instead.

Yep; I'll find time later this month to look at switching to use 53c700.

Richard


> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
> 						Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> 							    -- Linus Torvalds
> -
> : send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux