On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:36 -0400, James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:07 -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > > > At the SAS BOF, I indicated that it would not be much trouble to > > > translate the CSMI handler in the aacraid driver to a similar sysfs > > > arrangement. If such info can be mined from a firmware > > based RAID card, > > > every driver should be able to do so. The spec writers > > really need to > > > consider rewriting SDI for sysfs (if they have not already) and move > > > away from an ABI. > > > > that makes me wonder... why and how does T10 control linux abi's ?? > > Agreed. The most they should be doing is defining a library interface, and > letting the library hide the system specifics (like t11 and hbaapi, who > still got parts wrong). It also changes the argument from being a "linux abi" > to being "a defacto application/library abi". and not an ABI but an API. Which is important to allow the OS designers deal with architecture differences better. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
