Re: legacy megaraid driver bug in mm-series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:

"Ju, Seokmann" <sju@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:53 AM, Andrew Morton forwarded:
2.6.11-mm1:	works
2.6.11-mm4:	works
2.6.12-rc5-mm1:	will not compile
2.6.12-rc6-mm1:	works
2.6.12-mm1:	will not compile megaraid driver
2.6.12-mm2:	broken
2.6.13-mm1:	broken

2.6.12:		works
2.6.13:		works
Is there any precedence rule on the kernels?.


It's a bit weird, but the above are in chronological order.

Time order:

	2.6.12
	2.6.13-rc1
	2.6.13-rc2
	2.6.13
	2.6.14-rc1

etc.  And -mm kernels are just the current Linus kernel with -mmX appended.

I wonder which kernel is latest in between 2.6.12 and 2.6.12-mmx.

2.6.12-mmX

I assume 2.6.12-mmx is later than 2.6.12.

Correct.

2.6.13-mm1 doesn't work on my megaraid controller.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux