On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:49 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Quite frankly, what's the point in asking people to pull a tree that is > > known to not compile? > > Btw, I see the patch that is supposed to fix it, but I'm in no position to > know whether it's even acceptable to basically double the size of the > "struct klist", for example. There may be a good reason why Greg hasn't > been merging the klist stuff, and just assuming that they are merged not > only screws up everybody down-stream, it's not necessarily valid in the > first place. > > In other words, I think I will have to just revert the commit that > introduces this bogus "assume a patch that wasn't merged" (commit ID > 2b7d6a8cb9718fc1d9e826201b64909c44a915f4) for now. > > And once more strongly complain about it getting sent to me in the first > place since it was known to not even compile. He's been on holiday, but he did send me a sign off for that particular patch so I could put it through the SCSI tree. However, because Andrew sent you the patch before I could do this, there didn't seem to be any necessity ... James - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
