Re: [PATCH 1/7] zfcp: introduce eh_timed_out handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 14:53:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
 > Please don't do this.  We have proper midlayer handling (plus FC
 > transport
 > class wrappers) to handle that case without introducing a big mess in
 > the
 > driver.  Please take a look at fc_remote_port_{block,unblock}

Thanks for that hint.

But does fc_remote_port_unblock set online devices that were
previously offlined?

If not the problem of offlined devises is not solved with
this. If zfcp would block requests if it detects a path error a scsi
request might have already send to the devise which might cause that
the devise if offlined. Now if zfcp detects the path is up again and
calls fc_remote_port_unblock the device can still not be used because
it is offline.

I'll have to check the code if I am back from vacation.


Regards,

Andreas

(PS: sorry for using this alternate email account)
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux