Re: [RFC] libata new EH document

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:07 -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > Well, not really, since it's basic SCSI and the explanation's pretty
> > long.  However, the standards have several pages about it.  For your
> > reading pleasure, I suggest SAM-2 section 5.9.1 Contingent allegiance
> > (CA) and auto contingent allegiance (ACA)
> 
> SCSI Core knows nothing about ACA and/or how to use it.

I don't recall ever claiming that it did.  The discussion was about how
the error handler clears contingent allegiance conditions.

> You should also know that no one actually spells out CA or ACA,
> they just use the capitalized abbreviation, plus the fact that
> CA is obsolete.

Lets just say I'm TLA averse.

> Stop impressing the children!

Is that what people who constantly refer to standards are trying to do?
I must say I did wonder ...

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux