Re: libata: clustering on or off?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Clustering has always been a (small) win for the ATA/SATA hardware
I have worked on.  Many controllers read the scatter-gather list
"on demand", so if clustering is not used, there are a lot of
times where the controller must stop streaming data, and fetch
the next s/g entry, then resume streaming data.

Clustering reduces the number of such events, giving better bus
utilization and (slightly) faster transfers.

The more modern hardware I'm working with now will generally
read the s/g table in larger blocks, so that it only rarely
needs to interrupt data transfers to fetch s/g info.
Clustering is not as big a win with this, but still reduces
total bus cycles required.

Cheers
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux