Re: [PATCH] minimal SAS transport class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/24/05 16:42, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
>>And where does _it_ get it?
> 
> 
> You can write a program to supply it :)

Some of those would depend on the transport and I'd like
_transport_ things to "die" at _transport_ layer.

The transport layer would add as much as possible, then
SCSI Core, then sd then the block layer, then whoever is
on top.

Eventually you'd have a bunch of strings, which are labels,
with varied but ASCII contents.
 
>>Hey Patrick, is there a point to this thread?
> 
> 
> Yes, at this juncture a simplified explanation about udev rules.

Please go ahead.

>>If you have an idea, please go ahead and share and/or implement it.
>>If you're unclear on something please ask it directly.
> 
> I thought you were asking for details about udev ... your question was
> rather ambiguous.

Never did.

I was at a much, _much_, lower level.  Anyway, this is a rather
important issue which vendors want to have.  In fact it's very important
for them.

Let's take it up again in several days,

	Luben


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux