Re: [PATCH] minimal SAS transport class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> > that even if my minimal code goes in now there's absolutely no reason
> > we can't replace it completely later on.  See the evolution of the FC
> > transport class.
> 
> Who makes all those decisions?
> 
> More generally, why is SCSI Core not being managed by
> Documentation/ManagingStyle?
> 
> Is it because there's so much vendor interest here?

well Christophs code is the only one out there. So why shouldn't his be
merged? If better code comes along later it's easy to replace (or
extend)... what is the problem here??


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux