Re: increase SD_STATS ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Christoph,

Thanks for your answer.

Yes, I investigate about my kernel source (2.6.12) and I find that patches based on a RHEL kernel sources have been applied. This explains the odd 2.4 sd.c.

Best regards.


Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Frederic TEMPORELLI wrote:

Hi,


Due to SD_STATS=256  (/drivers/scsi/sd.c)
there's a limit on the max /dev/sd devices.

Now, we have a large FC fabric, with more than 3500 LUNs...
=> Of course, we have an Oops when an HBA is connected to the fabric
(still sd.c, BUG in function sd_iostats_bump when sd>SD_STATS)

What (bad) side-effects can be expected if we increase SD_STATS (4096 should be nice, may be 8192) ?


From you description it looks like you are using some odd 2.4.x vendor
tree.  Just upgrade to latest 2.6 and these limitations will go away.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
Frederic TEMPORELLI
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux