RE: Problem Adding Transport Class support to fusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 10:25 -0600, Moore, Eric Dean wrote:
> I suspect your using dated firmware. Try /proc/mpt/summary,
> and check FwRev.

Yes, that was it: the fw revision was 1.0.4.0

Updating to 1.3.39.0 allowed me to get at Page 0.

Are there many cards in the field like this?

> Also, have you remembered our cards support RAID?  We kick
> of DV when a drive is replaced failed drive in a mirror. That
> is kicked off when fw sends ASYC event saying that the
> driver must to DV on that hidden phys disk.

Yes, we had a non-attachment scheme that Christoph suggested for the
components of the RAID devices.

> FYI - I'm getting ready to post SAS support for split drivers design.  
> I prefer that we push out generic DV support after we get the 
> SAS updates in, and some other bits of FC transport support 
> that have been waiting in the wings for several months.

Well, this is more driven by me ... I need to get the generic DV working
on u320, and the 1030 is the only u320 SCSI card I have to try it with.

Thanks,

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux