Re: NBD (vs. iSCSI vs. EATA vs...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 01:41 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> IIUC, the suggestion from James to implement ATAPI translates in 
> user-space terms to implementing respective ioctl's, because this is what 
> nbd gets, and this is what nbd-server has to reproduce.

Actually, no, that's not what I was thinking.

nbd currently only understands the block layer REQ_CMD (which are basic
READ/WRITE commands) if it understood REQ_BLOCK_PC it would probably be
sufficient a transport for sending the packet commands that are
necessary to drive a remote device.

The idea being that you could then do

cdrom - nbd <--\/\-->remote - ide/scsi - CD-ROM device

to drive an actual cdrom.  There are some pieces missing in this vision
(like how to attach cdrom to nbd) but it should be doable in principle.

James


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux