On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 04:45:05PM -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > Could I get an historical (2.4 & Distribution) perspective on this. At > which point, or what code/include/manifest/version delineating it, would > you say the driver is no longer, if ever, required to place a lock > (host_lock or io_request_lock) around the scsi_done call? > > I expect (or hope) the answer to be: always needs io_request_lock in > 2.4, never needed the host_lock in 2.5+. You don't need any lock in 2.4 either. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
