Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: >> On Tue, May 24 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> I can describe how this will look when libata is divorced from SCSI, >>> if you would like, too... >> >> I was beginning to dispair you had given up that plan... > > hehe, nope. I promised Linus, and I plan to keep my promise :) > > I know how to do it. Internally things have been kept as separate as > possible from the SCSI layer. > > Bart even hinted at possibly using libata-without-SCSI for future > /dev/hdX support. It's certainly doable. > AAArgh! No, not again! We've finally succeeded in convincing everyone that having '/dev/sdX' instead of '/dev/hdX' was a neccessary step forward. I think we're getting shot if we now tell them to reverse this _again_. Can we at least have it optional? Or are you talking about linux-3.X ? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@xxxxxxx SuSE Linux AG S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
