Thanks for the replies On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Guy wrote: > My guess is the thing is a SAMBA server or similar. Yeah, logical:-) Didn't think about that. On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > No, just use iSCSI on top of the network. Sure, that'd be doable. Just have no idea - isn't it too much overhead? Say, over bluetooth, IP is already pretty high on the stack. OTOH, one could, possibly, take advantage of some features natively present in lower wireless levels, that don't get exported over IP? Disclaimer: I am quite ignorant about wireless as well as iSCSI internals, so, feel free to ignore me, if I am talking nonsense, however, would be grateful for any education:-) Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
