On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:23:33AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > In scsi_cmnd there's an element called host_scribble. The name and the > comment by it were sufficiently confusing that I didn't realise that this > field is basically for the host's private data. Any objections to something > like this, assuming I also submit a patch that converts all the drivers? Actually the situation about private data in scsi_cmnd is worse, there's another private data, that's the scsi_pointer structure embedded as SCp member. If we're going to fix up naming we should find a way to fixup both an have a sensible name for both embedded and out of struct private data. I somehow doubt it's going to happen before we drop support for gcc 2.95 and thus can use anonymous unions :) - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
