On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 06:03:16PM +1000, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > >The real problem is that someone decided to export the proc_name in sysfs. > >It's supposed to be only procfs-specific but someone violated that rule. > > Forget the "proc_" part. It is effectively the lld_name. > > Allowing the LLD to name itself to the scsi subsystem > makes sense, especially when the LLD is made up of several > kernel modules. See my previous example comparing the > output of lsscsi -H and scan_host.sh . In theory we have ->name for that, but people have decided to put really verbose stuff in there. A module name is important, not just for scsi. James once had a proposal where the scsi_host can link to the module in sysfs, which is the right thing and needed for other things like mkinitrd aswell. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
