On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:22 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Do we really need the sdev_lock pointer? There's just a single place > where we're using it and the code would be much more clear if it had just > one name. Humour me for a while. I don't believe we have any way the lock can be used after calling queue free, but nulling the sdev_lock pointer will surely catch them. If nothing turns up after a few kernel revisions, feel free to kill it. James - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
