On 07.03.2018 12:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Chanwoo, Archit, >> >> On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>>> Hi Rob and Andrzej, >>>> >>>> On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>>>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations. >>>>>> >>>>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with >>>>>> working example. >>>>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading >>>>>> to a happy end :) >>>>>> >>>>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function. >>>>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts. >>>>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C >>>>>> example. >>>>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Andrzej >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrzej Hajda (5): >>>>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector >>>>>> dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector >>>>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms >>>>>> arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector >>>>>> extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node >>>>>> >>>>>> Maciej Purski (1): >>>>>> drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL >>>>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's >>>>> acks for dts part). >>>>> Now I have a question how to merge them. >>>>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from >>>>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st. >>>>> I can merge it: >>>>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree. >>>>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via >>>>> samsung-soc tree. >>>>> >>>>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas? >>>> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1 >>>> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej. >>>> >>>> >>> I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request. >>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib-extcon-drm-dt-v4.17 >>> >>> Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me. >>> >> It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch. > I also took v5: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10244407/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10244431/ > > There was no v6 in samsung-soc patchwork. Is it a problem for DTS? No, v6 was only typo fix in comment, and only extcon patch has v6. Regards Andrzej > > BR, > Krzysztof > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |