On 12/11/2017 04:02 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:58:29PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:54:48PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> So I gave a quick look to this, and at the very least there's a bug in >>> the Exynos5800 Peach Pi DTS caused by commit 1cb686c08d12 ("ARM: dts: >>> exynos: Add status property to Exynos 542x Mixer nodes"). >>> >>> I've posted a fix for that: >>> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10105921/ >>> >>> I believe this could be also be the cause for the boot failure, since >>> I see in the boot log that things start to go wrong after exynos-drm >>> fails to bind the HDMI component: >>> >>> [ 2.916347] exynos-drm exynos-drm: failed to bind 14530000.hdmi (ops >>> 0xc1398690): -1 >> >> Umm, -1 ? Looking that error code up in >> include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h says it's -EPERM. >> >> I suspect that's someone just returning -1 because they're lazy... >> which is real bad form and needs fixing. > > Oh, it really is -EPERM: > > struct exynos_drm_crtc *exynos_drm_crtc_get_by_type(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > enum exynos_drm_output_type out_type) > { > struct drm_crtc *crtc; > > drm_for_each_crtc(crtc, drm_dev) > if (to_exynos_crtc(crtc)->type == out_type) > return to_exynos_crtc(crtc); > > return ERR_PTR(-EPERM); > } > > Does "Operation not permitted" really convey the error here? It doesn't > look like a permission error to me. > > Can we please avoid abusing errno codes? I tried 4.15-rc3 on odroid-xu4 after seeing drm issues reported. 4.15-rc2+ with top commit g968edbd worked just fine for me last Friday. I ran several tests and everything checked out except the exynos-gsc lockdep issue I sent a 4.14 patch for. However, with 4.15-rc3, dmesg is gets filled with [ 342.337181] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 342.337470] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 342.337851] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.382346] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.396682] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.399244] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.399496] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.399848] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.400163] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.400495] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.401294] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer [ 402.401595] [drm] Non-contiguous allocation is not supported without IOMMU, falling back to contiguous buffer Something broke in 4.15-rc3 on odroix-xu4 badly with exynos_defconfig. I will start bisect and try to isolate the problem. I suspect this is related to dts changes perhaps? I used to this problem a while back and it has been fixed. thanks, -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html