On 30 November 2017 at 13:14, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> clk_change_rate() propagates rate change down to all its children. Such
> operation requires managing proper runtime PM state of each child, what
> was missing. Add needed calls to clk_pm_runtime*() to ensure that
> set_rate() clock callback is called on runtime active clock.
>
> This fixes following issue found on Exynos5433 TM2 board with devfreq
> enabled:
>
> Synchronous External Abort: synchronous external abort (0x96000210) at 0xffffff80093f5600
> Internal error: : 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/u16:0 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1-next-20171129+ #4
> Hardware name: Samsung TM2 board (DT)
> Workqueue: devfreq_wq devfreq_monitor
> task: ffffffc0ca96b600 task.stack: ffffff80093a8000
> pstate: a0000085 (NzCv daIf -PAN -UAO)
> pc : clk_divider_set_rate+0x54/0x118
> lr : clk_divider_set_rate+0x44/0x118
> ...
> Process kworker/u16:0 (pid: 5, stack limit = 0xffffff80093a8000)
> Call trace:
> clk_divider_set_rate+0x54/0x118
> clk_change_rate+0xfc/0x4e0
> clk_change_rate+0x1f0/0x4e0
> clk_change_rate+0x1f0/0x4e0
> clk_change_rate+0x1f0/0x4e0
> clk_core_set_rate_nolock+0x138/0x148
> clk_set_rate+0x28/0x50
> exynos_bus_passive_target+0x6c/0x11c
> update_devfreq_passive+0x58/0xb4
> devfreq_passive_notifier_call+0x50/0x5c
> notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x88
> __srcu_notifier_call_chain+0x54/0x80
> srcu_notifier_call_chain+0x14/0x1c
> update_devfreq+0x100/0x1b4
> devfreq_monitor+0x2c/0x88
> process_one_work+0x148/0x3d8
> worker_thread+0x13c/0x3f8
> kthread+0x100/0x12c
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>
> Reported-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 9a34b45397e5 ("clk: Add support for runtime PM")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> For some unknown reason handling of this case was missing in the initial
> patch, which added runtime PM support for clock core. Even tests in
> linux-next did not revealed this issue. This patch finaly fixes it,
> as it is now easy to trigger it with v4.15-rc1.
>
> Best regards
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 647d056df88c..8a1860a36c77 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1564,6 +1564,9 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *core)
> best_parent_rate = core->parent->rate;
> }
>
> + if (clk_pm_runtime_get(core))
> + return;
> +
> if (core->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_UNGATE) {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> @@ -1634,6 +1637,8 @@ static void clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *core)
> /* handle the new child who might not be in core->children yet */
> if (core->new_child)
> clk_change_rate(core->new_child);
> +
> + clk_pm_runtime_put(core);
> }
>
> static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core,
> --
> 2.15.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
