On 10/16, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Hi Stephen, Mike, > > This change set is based off of your clk-pm-runtime branch, I needed to > do it that way as there were dependencies on the newly added clk runtime > PM feature. In this tag there is also a fix commit related to changes > introduced in the clk-pm-runtime branch. There will be a merge conflict, > you can find the conflict resolution hint below. > > The following changes since commit ae432a9b314e07d486acfadc4df2f922721e6757: > > clk: samsung: exynos-audss: Add support for runtime PM (2017-09-07 15:26:01 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/snawrocki/clk.git tags/clk-v4.15-exynos-pm Did you change keys recently? My older version of gnupg chokes on your signature which is slightly concerning. The other PR didn't have problems. > > for you to fetch changes up to 7679eb20353dc74e47fbc97b2d77fd4f88a77c0f: > > clk: samsung: Add a separate driver for Exynos4412 ISP clocks (2017-10-16 11:25:50 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > clk/samsung updates for v4.15, part 2 > > - An addition of separate driver for the Exynos 4412 ISP CMU, needed > to model and properly handle the clock controller's dependencies > on the ISP power domain. I find it sad that you opted to break the clk node up into two nodes and clk providers purely to satisfy the requirement that runtime PM be used with struct devices instead of solving the problem of multiple power domains for a single struct device and how that would work with runtime PM. Anyway, who am I to stand in the way of progress! I'll pull this into clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |