Hi Krzysztof,
On 2017-10-11 19:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:25:12AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Some registers for the Exynos 4412 ISP (Camera subsystem) clocks are
located in the ISP power domain. Because those registers are also
located in a different memory region than the main clock controller,
support for them can be provided by a separate clock controller.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos4-clock.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos4-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos4-clock.txt
index f5a5b19ed3b2..bc61c952cb0b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos4-clock.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos4-clock.txt
@@ -41,3 +41,46 @@ Example 2: UART controller node that consumes the clock generated by the clock
clocks = <&clock CLK_UART2>, <&clock CLK_SCLK_UART2>;
clock-names = "uart", "clk_uart_baud0";
};
+
+Exynos4412 SoC contains some additional clocks for FIMC-ISP (Camera ISP)
+subsystem. Registers for those clocks are located in the ISP power domain.
+Because those registers are also located in a different memory region than
+the main clock controller, a separate clock controller has to be defined for
+handling them.
+
+Required Properties:
+
+- compatible: should be "samsung,exynos4412-isp-clock".
+
+- reg: physical base address of the ISP clock controller and length of memory
+ mapped region.
+
+- #clock-cells: should be 1.
+
+- clocks: list of the clock controller input clock identifiers,
+ from common clock bindings, should point to CLK_ACLK200 and
+ CLK_ACLK400_MCUISP clocks from the main clock controller.
+
+- clock-names: list of the clock controller input clock names,
+ as described in clock-bindings.txt, should be "aclk200" and
+ "aclk400_mcuisp".
+
+- power-domains: a phandle to ISP power domain node as described by
+ generic PM domain bindings.
+
+Example 3: The clock controllers bindings for Exynos4412 SoCs.
+
+ clock: clock-controller@10030000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-clock";
+ reg = <0x10030000 0x18000>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ };
+
+ isp_clock: clock-controller@10048000 {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-isp-clock";
+ reg = <0x10048000 0x1000>;
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ power-domains = <&pd_isp>;
+ clocks = <&clock CLK_ACLK200>, <&clock CLK_ACLK400_MCUISP>;
+ clock-names = "aclk200", "aclk400_mcuisp";
+ };
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h
index c40111f36d5e..e9f9d400c322 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos4.h
@@ -272,4 +272,39 @@
/* must be greater than maximal clock id */
#define CLK_NR_CLKS 461
+/* Exynos4x12 ISP clocks */
Shouldn't the clock IDs go with driver changes? I think only the
Documentation/ part should be separate.
Well, Rob asked to move dt bindings and dt include to the separate patch.
I see no value-added by such split, as both dt and driver patches will be
processed together anyway, but I didn't want to have this patchset blocked
by this issue.
> ...
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
