Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add support for Hardkernel's Odroid HC1 board

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 08:59:34AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2017-10-02 08:44, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Marek Szyprowski
> > <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > > 
> > > On 2017-09-30 19:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:33:02PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > > > Odroid HC1 board is based on Odroid XU4 board, but it has no HDMI,
> > > > > no eMMC, no build-in USB3.0 hub, no extension port pins, and no GPIO
> > > > > button. USB3.0 ports are used for build-in JMicron USB to SATA bridge
> > > > > and Gigabit R8152 ethernet chips. HC1 uses only passive cooling.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile                         |   1 +
> > > > >    arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi      | 443
> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >    arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidhc1.dts         | 217 ++++++++++
> > > > >    arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5422-odroidxu3-common.dtsi | 428
> > > > > +-------------------
> > > > Please experiment with -M (maybe -M20%?) and -B so this would be
> > > > detected as rename. It might create much simpler patch thus making the
> > > > review easy (one could see that the changes are just movements).
> > > 
> > > I didn't manage to generate different patch with those options. I have
> > > however checked that odroidxu3/xu3-lite/xu4 dtbs are exactly the same after
> > > applying this patch (using dtx_diff tool).
> > Then it looks like the same issue as here:
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-January/477315.html
> > 
> > You are using some ancient git (v1.9.1) which was released more than
> > three years ago. March 2014. As Andi pointed in that thread - he had
> > no problems with -M and -B on newer version.
> 
> 3 years old software is not really an ancient software - it a stable version
> from LTS distro. Unless you need some newly added features it is imho fine
> to
> use for your DAILY work. Anyway, I've just checked with git v2.14.2 and it
> generates exactly the same diffs.

I also experimented (including -C and --find-copies-harder) but indeed
git did not want to detect the copy. Anyway thanks for trying and
confirming with dtx_diff.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux