Re: [RFT v2] mfd: exynos-lpass: Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All,

On 2017-08-10 08:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value.
we must call pm_runtime_disable() and pm_runtime_set_suspended(),
If exynos_lpass_probe is not successful.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@xxxxxxxxx>
---
changes in v2:
              added regmap_exit(lpass->top) and blank line before return.

  drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

For me looks ok although this requires testing and I do not have
Exynos with LPASS (e.g. Exynos5433). Maybe folks from Samsung (Polish
R&D or HQ as they are working on it) could help (Cced).

Works fine on Exynos5433 based TM2e.

Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
index ca829f8..1ab7210 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/exynos-lpass.c
@@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ static void exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(struct exynos_lpass *lpass, int mask)
  	regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_CORE_SW_RESET, val);
  }
-static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
+static int exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
  {
-	clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(lpass->sfr0_clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
/* Unmask SFR, DMA and I2S interrupt */
  	regmap_write(lpass->top, SFR_LPASS_INTR_CA5_MASK,
@@ -87,6 +91,8 @@ static void exynos_lpass_enable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
  	exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_I2S_SW_RESET);
  	exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_DMA_SW_RESET);
  	exynos_lpass_core_sw_reset(lpass, LPASS_MEM_SW_RESET);
+
+	return 0;
  }
static void exynos_lpass_disable(struct exynos_lpass *lpass)
@@ -112,6 +118,7 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	struct exynos_lpass *lpass;
  	void __iomem *base_top;
  	struct resource *res;
+	int ret;
lpass = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpass), GFP_KERNEL);
  	if (!lpass)
@@ -136,7 +143,13 @@ static int exynos_lpass_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, lpass);
  	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
  	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
-	exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+	ret = exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
+	if (ret) {
+		pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+		pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
+		regmap_exit(lpass->top);
+		return ret;
+	}
return devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
  }
@@ -167,9 +180,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused exynos_lpass_resume(struct device *dev)
  {
  	struct exynos_lpass *lpass = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
-
-	return 0;
+	return exynos_lpass_enable(lpass);
  }
static const struct dev_pm_ops lpass_pm_ops = {
--
1.9.1

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux