On Tue, 04 Apr 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi Lee, > >> > >> > >> This is dependency for mfd/exynos-lpass driver changes from Marek Szyprowski. > >> That's a material for v4.12 and I will be pushing this later to Linus Walleij. > > > > This does not work, and *may* still break. > > > > The only way to guarantee the order of the patches is to have them > > *all* as part of the pull-request. Not just some of them. > > What do you mean exactly? If these two patches come through my tree > first, then everything will work fine because they do not break any > other stuff. > > If you pull it and apply the rest on top, then it should also work > without problems because your history will contain everything needed > in proper order. > > In both cases bisectability is preserved. Did I missed something? Okay, so you're suggesting that I rebase MFD *on-top* of your PR. That does work for me because I insist on being able to re-work my tree at any time. However, be aware that some Maintainers do not work this way, thus *normally* you will have to send PR containing all of the dependant patches. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |