Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] irq: Add flags to request_percpu_irq function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/23/2017 10:42 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> In the next changes, we track the interrupts but we discard the timers as
> that does not make sense. The next interrupt on a timer is predictable.
>
> But, the API request_percpu_irq does not allow to pass a flag, hence specifying
> if the interrupt type is a timer.
>
> Solve this by passing a 'flags' parameter to the function and change all the
> callers to pass IRQF_TIMER when the interrupt is a timer interrupt, zero
> otherwise.
>
> For now, in order to prevent a misusage of this parameter, only the IRQF_TIMER
> flag is a valid parameter to be passed to the request_percpu_irq function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   # for arch/arc, arc_timer bits
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux