On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:52:14PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:35:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:27:16PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote: >> > > Use devm_gpiochip_add_data to simplify the error path in >> > > samsung_gpiolib_register. Additionally this would also fix a leak if >> > > the pinctrl driver was unbound, although admittedly I can't see any >> > > good use-case for doing so, but the driver does currently allow it. >> > >> > Driver does not allow unbinding (.suppress_bind_attrs = true)... >> > >> >> Oops... sorry missed that. > > Can you resend with updated commit msg? I think it was not picked up by > Linus yet. I'm expecting you to pick it up and send to me by pull request now I guess, or did we agree that a Samsung patches wouldn't be too voluminous this cycle? If you're OK with it, can we proceed to use you as Samsung patch collection point for this kernel cycle from this moment on? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |