Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos/dsi: make te-gpios optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15.03.2017 04:48, Inki Dae wrote:
>
> 2017년 03월 14일 00:30에 Andrzej Hajda 이(가) 쓴 글:
>> In case of HW-TRIGGER te-gpios interrupt is not necessary. With this
>> patch we can get rid of 60 interrupt callbacks per second.
> Andrzej,
>
> Sorry but above description is not clear.

I agree, it could be improved.

>
> If panel device node of command mode panel device doesn't provide te-gpios property then now the panel driver will fail to probe.
> Seems this patch makes it to allow the panel driver probing is always ok even if gpio is invalid.

I guess you mean DSI driver.

>
> So how about handling this at top of this function like below?
>
> if (!of_property_read_bool(node, "te-gpios"))
> 	return 0;

Looks OK, it can be also done without additional call:
dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(dsi->panel_node, "te-gpios", 0);
if (dsi->te_gpio == -ENOENT)
        return 0;

>
> And I think the description should be modified properly including subject of this patch. 

OK, I will post v2.

BTW, I though little bit about it and:
1. te-gpios property is in panel node, but panel driver do not use it at
all.
2. it is parsed by DSI driver, but DSI driver does not need it at all,
it just forwards it to DECON.
3. DECON driver uses it, but it does not control it at all: parsing,
switching on/off, life time.

So maybe it would better to move whole te-gpios property to DECON node,
maybe even make it interrupt property instead of gpio, as it servers
only to irq.
After move DECON driver would know when this property is required and
probe should fail (SW mode), it could control enable/disable of
associated irq - currently the code is racy,
and finally there will not be parsing of panel node by DSI driver - it
violates DT principles.

What do you think about it?

Regards
Andrzej

>
> Thanks,
> Inki Dae
>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>> index 812e2ec..f95fac5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>> @@ -1349,9 +1349,8 @@ static int exynos_dsi_register_te_irq(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
>>  
>>  	dsi->te_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(dsi->panel_node, "te-gpios", 0);
>>  	if (!gpio_is_valid(dsi->te_gpio)) {
>> -		dev_err(dsi->dev, "no te-gpios specified\n");
>> -		ret = dsi->te_gpio;
>> -		goto out;
>> +		dev_info(dsi->dev, "no te-gpios specified\n");
>> +		return 0;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	ret = gpio_request(dsi->te_gpio, "te_gpio");
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux