On 31-01-17, 07:17, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> > This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference
> > to the OPPs returned by them.
> >
> > Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call
> > dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs.
> >
> > As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used,
> > the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore.
> > Drop it as well.
> >
> > This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was
> > returning an OPP received from the OPP core.
> >
> > Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained
> > rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs
> > within them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> [Devfreq]
>
> This patch gets a lot of fails during application.
>
> For devfreq-side, I've got:
> error: drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c:103
> error: drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c:59
> error: drivers/devfreq/governor_passive.c: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c:91
> error: drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c: patch does not apply
> error: patch failed: drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c:487
> error: drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c: patch does not apply
>
> With the condition that you are going to properly rebase the patch,
> you may add "Reviewed-by" from me.
> (the code itself looks fine.)
This is already applied by Rafael and was based over his tree only.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
