On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 01:18:55PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For everyone working on power management and runtime power management it
> is important to have a meaningful information about the state of the
> power domains. Current Exynos power domain driver created names of the
> domains based on the device tree node name. Those name
> we incorrectly a bit more descriptive (like "mfc-power-domain@10023C40"
> in exynos4.dtsi) than they should be (it should be fixed to
> "power-domain@10023C40"). This patch series adds reading human readable
> names from the 'label' property. While touching this, I've also fixes
> a few obvious issues related to power domain driver code.
>
> Patches are based on the Linux next-20170130 branch.
>
> Best regards
> Marek Szyprowski
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
I think I am missing something... but it looks it does not work. I
applied it on top of my for-next tree and:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
domain status slaves
/device runtime status
----------------------------------------------------------------------
isp-power-domain@10023CA0 off-0
gps-alive-power-domain@10023D00 off-0
gps-power-domain@10023CE0 off-0
cam-power-domain@10023C00 off-0
Also, with enabled debug on pm-domains and unbinding a device:
[ 180.016800] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: genpd_runtime_resume()
[ 180.017289] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: genpd_runtime_suspend()
[ 180.017519] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: Removing 13400000.codec
[ 180.024283] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: removing from PM domain mfc-power-domain@10023C40
[ 180.024323] s5p-mfc 13400000.codec: genpd_remove_device()
I think in both cases the genpd->name is used... which should be the new
name (label).
What is wrong?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
