Hi Krzysztof,
On 2017-01-27 08:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:55:36PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
This patch adds support for GSCL power domain to Exynos 5433 SoCs, which
contains following devices: a clock controller, three GSCL video scalers and
their SYSMMUs.
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
index 16072c1c3ed3..74c767d756ac 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi
@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@
clocks = <&xxti>,
<&cmu_top CLK_ACLK_GSCL_111>,
<&cmu_top CLK_ACLK_GSCL_333>;
+ power-domains = <&pd_gscl>;
};
cmu_apollo: clock-controller@11900000 {
@@ -525,6 +526,12 @@
<&cmu_top CLK_ACLK_CAM1_552>;
};
+ pd_gscl: gscl-power-domain@105c4000 {
The name of node: just "power-domain". This should be generic class of
device (following ePAPR).
The same applies to other patches.
Well, this makes the debugging much harder, but I will change it to generic
names. Also existing Exynos dtsi should be fixed in this area (Exynos4 still
use such more descriptive names). I will check how hard is to add real
domain names directly to the Exynos power domain driver then.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
