On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 08:47:44AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On 2017-01-27 08:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:55:34PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patchset is a final step to add support for all power domains > > > on Exynos5433 SoCs. This patchset contains patches for adding Exynos5433 > > > support to Exynos power domain driver and definitions of all power > > > domains found in Exynos5433 SoCs. > > > > > > Patches have been generated on top of linux-next from 25th January 2017. > > > > > > This is a part of a larger task, which goal is to add support for power > > > domains on Exynos5433 SoCs / TM2 boards. All patches needed to get it > > > working have been pushed to the following git repo: > > > https://git.linaro.org/people/marek.szyprowski/linux-srpol.git v4.10-next-tm2-pd > > > > > > To get everything working following patches/patchsets are needed on top > > > of the linux-next tree: > > By "get everything working" you also mean that there is a runtime > > dependency? In other words, can I apply DTS patches here? > > IMHO we should wait with applying pm domains DTS patches. Without ALL other > patches > kernel will sooner or later panic with "(a)synchronous external abort" or > deadlock > in a different way. Okay, makes sense. A partial solution would be to apply them with status=disabled. After all it is still a valid description of a hardware. However this would not bring much benefits anyway... Beside the name of node I mentioned, please put all the power domains sorted to each other by address. I see the big picture here: https://git.linaro.org/people/marek.szyprowski/linux-srpol.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi?h=v4.10-next-tm2-pd and it does not looks ordered. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |