Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: Forward slave device pointer to of_xlate callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ulf,

On 2017-01-24 16:09, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 24 January 2017 at 10:27, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add pointer to slave device to of_dma_xlate to let DMA engine driver
to know which slave device is using given DMA channel. This will be
later used to implement non-irq-safe runtime PM for DMA engine driver.

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
[...]

diff --git a/include/linux/of_dma.h b/include/linux/of_dma.h
index b90d8ec57c1f..a0a6c8c17669 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_dma.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_dma.h
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ struct of_dma {
         struct list_head        of_dma_controllers;
         struct device_node      *of_node;
         struct dma_chan         *(*of_dma_xlate)
-                               (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *);
+                               (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *,
+                                struct device *);
         void                    *(*of_dma_route_allocate)
                                 (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *);
         struct dma_router       *dma_router;
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ struct of_dma_filter_info {
  #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_OF
  extern int of_dma_controller_register(struct device_node *np,
                 struct dma_chan *(*of_dma_xlate)
-               (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *),
+               (struct of_phandle_args *, struct of_dma *, struct device *),
                 void *data);
  extern void of_dma_controller_free(struct device_node *np);

@@ -47,17 +48,17 @@ extern int of_dma_router_register(struct device_node *np,
                 struct dma_router *dma_router);
  #define of_dma_router_free of_dma_controller_free

-extern struct dma_chan *of_dma_request_slave_channel(struct device_node *np,
+extern struct dma_chan *of_dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *slave,
                                                      const char *name);
I noticed that this API is being used from sound/soc/sh/rcar/dma.c, so
I assume this change triggers a compiler error. I guess you want to
fold in a change dealing with that as well.

Right. Thanks for pointing this.

I didn't expect that of_dma_request_slave_channel() is used outside drivers/dma, especially in such a creative way as in sh/rcar driver. I will change a function
signature to:

of_dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *slave, struct device_node *np, const char *name)

then, as there is no direct relation between device and of node pointer, from
which rcar driver extracts the dma channel data.

I would also expect that zero-day build robot will complain about missing
sh/rcar driver update, but I didn't get any message from it.

[...]

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>

Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux