On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 02:15:40PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 01/20/2017 01:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 07:29:55PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> Commit 94aed538e032 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Add async-bridge clock to MFC
> >> power domain for Exynos5420") fixed an imprecise external abort error
> >> when the MFC registers were tried to be accessed and the needed clock
> >> for the asynchronous bridges were gated.
> >>
> >> But according to the Exynos5420 manual the "Gating AXI clock for MFC"
> >> is not CLK_ACLK333 but CLK_MFC.
> >>
> >> The end effect is the same because CLK_ACLK333 is a parent of CLK_MFC
> >> but the correct clock should be used instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Is this still needed?
> >
>
> Not really, only if we care about correctness in the existing power domains
> that have their clocks defined. But as said, even currently with CLK_ACLK333
> works due to the clock hierarchy.
>
> I think is less of an issue now that we prefer to mark clocks that needs to
> be ungated as critical instead of growing the DT ABI.
Okay then, I'll skip the patch. Resend if it turns out to be needed.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
