On 01/20/2017 01:32 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 01/20/2017 11:41 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On Exynos5800 SoC the SCALER block uses 2 input clocks: CLK_ACLK_300_GSCL >> and CLK_ACLK432_SCALER, so both needs to be ungated in order to access it. >> >> But Exynos5420 only has the CLK_ACLK_300_GSCL as gsc_pd clk. So just using >> this definition from exynos5420.dtsi in Exynos5800 leads to the following: > [...] >> So until a proper solution based on runtime PM gets merged, mark the clock >> as critical to prevent it to be gated. >> >> Suggested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> Oops, the $subject patch can be dropped since as Marek just pointed out to me the changes introduced by that patch are already included in a patch which is already in the v4.10 fixes queue: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=318fa46cc60d37fec1e87dbf03a82aca0f5ce695 -- Thanks, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |